
"Pregnant in Lace" by Catherine Steinmann
Great
strides have been made in the last few years in terms of educating the American
public about the safety of home birth. Numerous studies have shown that not
only is home birth a viable alternative to hospital birth, but in many cases it
has actually been proven to be safer. Of course, many women are simply unaware
of these findings. But of the ones who are, most of them are still choosing a
technocratic, physician-centered hospital birth, over a holistic,
woman-centered home birth. It would help all of us if we could understand the
reasons behind this choice.
Pressure
from parents and in-laws, inability to find a midwife or physician who will
deliver a baby at home, and desire to escape the demands of being a housewife
and mother for a few days, are all reasons I've heard women give for choosing a
hospital birth. But at the top of the list, second only to safety, is the
desire for pain relief.
"I
love the idea of a home birth," one woman told me, "but I've been through birth
before and I NEED that epidural." A caring midwife can give a woman a
tremendous amount of emotional and physical support to help her endure and even
lessen the pain of labor, but if she can't eliminate the pain by the use of
drugs, many women will opt for the emotionally sterile, but "relatively"
painless hospital delivery.
My
question is, why must we have only have two choices? Isn't it possible to have
our cake and eat it too? I believe it is, but first we must be willing to
examine the nature of our beliefs.
According
to numerous sources, both historical and contemporary, what we believe about
birth, and about life itself, has a direct and profound effect on our labors.
If we believe, for instance, that there is a vast, loving intelligence who
created our bodies with the expressed purpose of reproducing (among other
things), or that evolution works in our favor, we are less apt to fight the contractions of labor and therefore less
likely to experience them as painful. On the other hand, if we believe that
life is the result of an accidental chemical reaction, and that our bodies are
poorly designed, we will most likely resist our labor contractions and
consequently suffer a great deal of pain in the process.
Many
authors have written about the power of our thoughts and beliefs but few as
extensively as the late Jane Roberts. According to Roberts in her book The Nature
of Personal Reality, thoughts and beliefs are not simply
nebulous words floating about in our heads. They are instead electromagnetic
realities, which once conceived, have an intense desire to manifest themselves
in our lives. The stronger the thought, the more quickly it will come into our
experience. We get what we concentrate on. Or, as author Richard Bach states in
his book Illusions, "We magnetize into our lives whatever we hold
in our thought."
Our
day to day life will always seem to reinforce our beliefs. Physicians, for
instance, can present us with numerous examples of women who would have died
had they not given birth in the hospital. What they refuse to see, however, is
that they, and the women they "deliver", all believe to one degree or another,
that birth is painful and dangerous--otherwise they wouldn't be doing it in a
hospital equipped with all of the latest technology. Their belief then, is
precisely what makes it so.
Early
natural childbirth advocate Grantly Dick-Read had a deep understanding of the
importance of not only the laboring woman's beliefs, but also those of the
people who attend her. In Childbirth without Fear he wrote:
Suggestion
of pain is conveyed by the atmosphere of the labor room; it emanates from
doctors, nurses and relatives. They believe in pain; subconsciously or
consciously they suggest, expect and even presume pain. Upon the sensitive mind
of a woman in labor such authoritative [suggestions are] a powerful adjuvant to
painful sensations.
Lester
Hazell, the former president of the International Childbirth Education
Association, wrote that "what happens at birth tends to be guided by our belief
system about birth." Childbirth educator Carl Jones writes in Mind Over Labor:
A
positive image of birth is the cornerstone of a safe, happy birth experience.
If you believe your body is meant to give birth efficiently, naturally, and
without complications and that birth is a joyful event, you are more than
halfway to a safe, natural birth. Positive beliefs and attitudes contribute to
a happy birth experience, enabling the mother to labor more efficiently and to
open for her baby with less effort.
This
concept is certainly not a new one. Many childbirth authors have written about
it in the last few years and many midwives routinely help women to uncover
their beliefs about birth, their bodies, and life in general. But in reading
numerous birthing books and speaking with many midwives in the last few years,
I've noticed that there seems to be a self-imposed limit on just how far we can
take this. It's not uncommon for a midwife to tell a woman that pain in labor
is actually desirable. In an article in Midwifery Today titled
"Birth in Holland," midwife Beatrijs Smulders made the following statement:
We
tell our women that pain is a must. You can handle the pain, it's functional.
Without the pain you take away the heart of the event. It's change, it's tough,
but your body is made for it.
If
our bodies are made for birth, why then must it be painful? Would God or nature
design our bodies so that conceiving a child feels wonderful but birthing one
does not? As Grantly Dick-Read said, no other natural bodily function is
painful and childbirth should not be an exception.
So
why then is childbirth painful for the majority of women giving birth today?
Many people are familiar with Dick-Read's "fear/tension/pain
syndrome" and I believe his theories are profoundly correct. But I also
believe there's more to it than that. Perhaps too many of us see pain as a
badge of courage--proof that "we are just as strong as men." If men can suffer
on the battle field, we can suffer in childbirth and then tell ourselves how
brave we were to have endured it. Or maybe, in keeping with the mechanistic
view of life, we firmly believe that our bodies are poorly constructed and
therefore incapable of opening up without tremendous pain or surgical
intervention.
In
a recent New York Times article, Jessica Mitford, an advocate of
home birth, actually espouses the very beliefs that make women want to run to
physicians when they're in labor.
It's
amazing how badly designed the human body is...The Creator must have been
laughing up His sleeve...as He drew up the blueprint for the vagina, urethra
and anus--jumbling them together in a most incommodious little space and in a
way bound to be very awkward, given their separate and distinctly incompatible
purposes...As for the system for giving birth, in which the baby makes its
painful way through a passage fraught with peril to both itself and its mother,
some equivalent of a zipper down the mother's abdomen...would have made
everything so much easier.
Obviously
many physicians must agree--the cesarean rate is now over 20% in this country.
As I was reading Mitford's statement, I was reminded of a similar one written
by Dr. Robert Sokol, professor and chairman of OB/GYN at Wayne State University
and Hutzel Hospital in Detroit: "The vagina is not made for having babies any
more than the penis is." If we accept the idea that our beliefs create our
experiences, it's easy to understand why most women in our culture have painful
and often difficult labors.
However,
not all women in our contemporary society have adhered to these beliefs. Around
the turn of the century, many of the early feminists believed that the pain and
problems in labor were a direct result of the commonly held belief that the
female body was inherently inferior to that of the male. They heard about the
Indian women who were giving birth easily and believed that with the proper
mind set, they could do the same. Childbirth, then, became a way for women to
prove to themselves and others that women were strong and capable of
determining their own fates. Elizabeth Cady Stanton wrote:
If
you suffer, it is not because you are cursed of God, but because you violate
his laws. What an incubus it would take from woman could she be educated to
know that the pains of maternity are no curse upon her kind. We know that among
Indians the squaws do not suffer in childbirth. They will step aside from the
ranks, even on the march, and return in a short time bearing with them the
new-born child. What an absurdity, then, to suppose that only enlightened
Christian women are cursed.
But one word of fact is worth a volume of philosophy; let me give you some of
my own experience. I am the mother of seven children. My girlhood was spent
mostly in the open air. I early imbibed the idea that a girl is just as good as
a boy, and I carried it out. I would walk five miles before breakfast, or ride
ten on horseback....I wore my clothing sensibly....I never compressed my
body....When my first four children were born, I suffered very little. I then
made up my mind that it was totally unnecessary for me to suffer at all; so I
dressed lightly, walked every day...and took proper care of myself. The night
before the birth...I walked three miles. The child was born without a particle
of pain. I bathed it and dressed it myself.
Today,
women around the world are re-learning just how pleasurable childbirth can be
when one has the right beliefs. Many women are finding that it can actually be
orgasmic. Jeannine Parvati Baker claims
that with one of her births she spontaneously began having orgasms without any
manual stimulation. She writes:
I
feel the baby come down. The sensation is ecstatic. I had prepared somewhat for
this being as painful as my last delivery had been. Yet this time the pulse of
birth feels wonderful! I am building up to the birth climax after nine months
of pleasurable foreplay....How glad I am for all those years of orgasms! Slow
orgasms, fast ones, those which build and subside and peak again and again.
That practice aids my baby's gentle emergence so that he doesn't spurt out too
quickly. He comes, as do I.
Author
Helen Wessel also gives examples of women who found that birth could be an
orgasmic experience. In Natural Childbirth and the Christian Family
she quotes one woman as saying, "It was the most intense orgasm!" Another woman
says, "It was ecstatic, wonderful, thrilling. I heard myself moaning-in
triumph, not in pain! There was no pain whatsoever, only a primitive and sexual
elation....With the most spiraling, fascinating thrill of all, I felt my baby
slither out. I wanted to shout with joy."
In
Marilyn Moran's book Happy Birth Days, Donn Reed
gave the following account of the birth of his baby:
As
the baby crowned, I knew from Jean's look and sounds that she was having an
explosive orgasm, which rolled on and on. What a long way from the pain and
agony of conventional myth! Years later we asked a sympathetic doctor about
this. "Yes," he said, "I've seen it a few times. It may even be that many women
have orgasms during birth, but interpret them as pain because the sensations
are more intense than anything previously experienced and because women are
conditioned to expect pain."
To
this I would add that many women are simply too ridden with guilt and shame of
their sexuality to allow themselves to experience birth this way.
Unfortunately, years and years of sexual repression in our society have had a
tremendous effect upon the psyches of both men and women.
This
is not to say that we should condemn ourselves in any way. The act of giving
birth itself takes tremendous courage and we should commend ourselves for it
fully. But wouldn't it be nice if we could remember our births as the most
pleasurable experience of our lives rather than the most painful? None of us
need to be martyrs when it comes to giving birth. We are all deserving of
pleasure and I believe it is there to be found.
So
what can we as midwives, childbirth educators, and women do to help all women
make childbirth more pleasurable? We can start by changing our own beliefs
about birth. We can free ourselves from the mechanistic view of life and
embrace a new holistic philosophy which does not presume to put arbitrary
limits upon women, the experience of giving birth, or life itself. We can stop
telling women that "pain is a must" or "pain is the heart of labor" and tell
them instead that "trust is a must" and "love is the heart of labor." We can
help women to embrace their sexuality and love their bodies without shame and
without guilt. We can encourage them to listen to the voices within themselves
for it is there that the answers will be found.
It
may take us several generations before we will be able to free ourselves fully
from the societally imposed fear, shame and guilt that keep many of us from
allowing ourselves to experience pleasure in any area of our lives. But if we
can at least present pleasurable childbirth as a possibility, we will all have
something to work for, and someday, we are bound to achieve it.
*
* * * * * * * * * * *
An
edited version of this article originally appeared in
Midwifery Today.
Photo
copyright Catherine
Steinmann.